Membership Area
e-mail
password
Forgot password?
To register place your 1st order
Top writing service
  • 93% of satisfied customers
  • 24/7 customer support
  • A wide range of services
  • 3-hour delivery available
  • BA/MA/PhD writers
  • Custom-written papers only
  • Free plagiarism report (on demand)
  • Free revision within 48 hours
  • Direct communication with a writer
discount
All our papers are  WRITTEN FROM SCRATCH
All our papers are
WRITTEN FROM SCRATCH
We do not compromise the quality of the papers delivered. At SuperbEssay.com, you can trust our refund policy. If you prove that a low quality paper has been delivered, you get your money back!
qualyti
100% Quality guarantee
TESTIMONIALS
Do you want some real proof that we can cope with your essay? The customers' reviews about our services are the most substantial evidence of our writing quality. Why don't you have a look at our testimonials and see why people come back to our website every semester?
people
100% Quality guarantee
4 SIMPLE STEPS OF THE PROCESS
All you need to do is choose the type of your future paper, set the deadline, provide us with all the necessary details regarding your paper, wait a bit, and download the final product created by our professionals.
people2
3 main reasons why you should
CHOOSE OUR COMPANY
  • Affordable prices.
  • Quality papers.
  • On time delivery.
100% Quality guarantee
DISCOUNTS
Superbessay.com offers 2 kinds of discount programs to customers. The first type is for the first-time customers. It allows them to save up to 15% on the first order. The second one is a fidelity program for our returning clients. It is possible to get lifetime discounts of 5%, 10%, and 15% off the original price.
100% Quality guarantee
YOUR DEMO ACCOUNT
An attractive option, which allows you to always view your demo account, is another thing which proves professionalism of our writing service. It will help you evaluate our company's performance during the working process.
← Knowledge in EmergencyMathematics Lesson Plan →

Leadership and Decision-Making in Twelve O'Clock High

Buy Custom Leadership and Decision-Making in Twelve O'Clock High Essay

Synopsis

In the sixth episode of the first season of Twelve O’Clock HighPressure Points – Senator Clayton Johnson, who works for the Appropriations Committee, recommends the discontinuation of a long-range attack weapons program because of its outcomes. Senator Johnson’s decision was met with opposition from Brigadier General Frank Savage, who argued that the program should not be discontinued but rather improved to prevent system and manpower losses on their part. Due to problems concerning the military’s long-range weapons, the army’s capacity to attack from afar was stripped. As a result, General Savage decided to use short-range weapons to attack targets Hamburg and Kiel. However, General Savage’s plan turned sour when weather conditions prevented them from going through with the attack.

While waiting for bad weather to pass, the Vicar of Archbury visits General Savage. During their conversation, Eddie Pryor and April Barret’s marriage came up. General Savage talked to Pryor about his relationship with April, and the latter confessed that although he loves the girl deeply, he finds it difficult to commit. After the weather clears, the army goes on their next mission. During their mission, Pryor is trapped inside the plan. General Savage responded immediately by calling Major Roberts and his company to save Pryor. Major Roberts was successful in retrieving Pryor.

Leadership and Decision-Making Strategies

In the episode, the characters illustrate different leadership and decision-making strategies. Senator Johnson as a member of the Appropriations Committee had to make a valuable decision concerning the distribution of finances within the military. Senator Johnson is responsible for evaluating expenses and appropriating fees in projects or programs when necessary. Since the long-range attack weapons program of the military was incurring losses due to the destruction of aircrafts and manpower losses, Senator Johnson saw it necessary to stop the program altogether. Senator Johnson’s view made the decision as a member of the Appropriations Committee. However, the Senator failed to view the problem from a broader perspective.

In addition, when Senator Johnson decided to recommend the discontinuation of the military’s long-range attack weapons program, Johnson failed to involve other parties involved in the decision-making process. Senator Johnson may be a member of the Appropriations Committee, but making the decision required views and judgments from other members concerned including General Savage, who is familiar with the plans, capabilities and needs of the military. Senator Johnson could have consulted other parties. Hence, his leadership may be considered as authoritarian and decision-making strategy following that of the directive style. Senator Johnson wanted to discontinue the program, and he expects the military to relent to his directives.

Type of assignment Writer level Title of your paper Pages
Spacing Urgency Currency Total price
 

General Savage opposed Senator Johnson’s directive by arguing that what the program lacks is support. Aircrafts are being destroyed, and the military is losing manpower in the process because of inadequate resources. Hence, General Savage thinks that as a member of the Appropriations Committee, Senator Johnson could have set funds to improve the long-range attack weapons program in order to prevent losses. Moreover, General Savage believes that the military could benefit from the program if only it receives support and appropriate resources to make operations effective. General Savage applies analytical thinking and conceptualization in making decisions. Instead of nipping the program in the bud to prevent more losses, just as Johnson recommended, General Savage thought about the situation in depth and thought of various opportunities to expand the program, improve efficiency, and increase positive outcomes while preventing losses in the process.

General Savage also analyzed the issue from various angles. Considering Senator Johnson’s recommendations, General Savage explored other possibilities that might bring about more positive outcomes or advantages for the government and the military. Conceptualization is also General Savage’s key strategy, because he thought about drawing long-term outcomes and advantages from the project. Moreover, General Savage came up with a creative solution to make the program a profitable and advantageous investment for the government.

While planning the attack of Hamburg and Kiel, General Savage also displayed good decision-making by taking advantage of available resources. Due to Senator Johnson’s recommendations, it took a while for the army’s long-range attack weapons to deploy, hence posing challenges and barriers to General Savage’s attack plan. General Savage is a resourceful strategist and decided to make do with the weapons they have by attacking at close range. His decision illustrates his resourcefulness as a strategist and creativity as a decision-maker. Apart from being resourceful and creative, General Savage is also a good leader.

When Pryor was trapped in his plan, General Savage took advantage of all his resources to achieve his goal of saving Pryor. General Savage assessed the situation well and utilized available resources by deploying Major Roberts and his team to save Pryor. The situation also illustrates General Savage’s responsiveness as a leader. Overall, his leadership style could also be characterized as participative and delegative, because General Savage delegates tasks among members of the army who are capable of achieving goals of the plan or the mission. The decisions of General Savage and Senator Johnson illustrate the differences between the former and the latter’s leadership and decision-making styles and strategies.

Buy Custom Leadership and Decision-Making in Twelve O'Clock High Essay

Related essays

  1. Mathematics Lesson Plan
  2. Public and Private Theatres
  3. Knowledge in Emergency
  4. Communication Process: Is it a Key to Employee's Satisfaction
logo