Since long ago Catholics with their religious point of view have been sure that it is necessary to feed babies with mother’s milk. It is natural, and it is a duty for each mother to sacrifice herself for her children and put their interests before her own wishes. This is natural for women, and they have to remember about their main role (Badinter, 2012). In America, there are several organizations, such as La Leche League, for example, that are trying to persuade women into breastfeeding (Badinter, 2012). These organizations are quite right with their goals, as nothing could be better than mother’s milk. The modern society full of information, fashion rules, feminism and so on dictates women that they are totally free and have no obligations. Why should women stay with their babies for a long time? Many fashion magazines claim that it is necessary to go to the gym straight after the birth of a child, and why to stay home when nowadays it is possible to start working straight after giving birth to a child. There is plenty of artificial baby food everywhere in the shops. Women can buy any food for children of any age. Thus, the information available, the variety of choices and food etc. have a negative influence of contemporary women. A woman should not be forced to feed when she is sick or unable to breastfeed for some other reasons, but it is necessary to write and speak about this issue and provide women with the maximum of information about the necessity of breastfeeding. Everybody is talking about the benefit of running or trainings in the gym, because it is good for health, but nobody dares to think that we are probably forced to go for running, for instance. Why do we think then that breastfeeding is a hard obligation? There are many natural ways to raise lactogenesis. It may be painful, but to give birth is even more painful than breast-feeding. It is natural and extremely useful for a mother and a child. It is not a secret that children who were not breast-fed are much weaker than those kids that got milk from their mothers’ breasts. Of course, there are women who cannot feed with breast because of health problems, but the majority of women just have no desire to do so for some reasons. Nothing can be stronger than mother’s love to her child, and of course, it is a sacrifice. Women who cannot breastfeed their children do not have to feel regret. If they tried all the possible ways to produce milk but failed, they can do much more for their kids than just to give milk. They can share love which is more valuable, because real sacrificial love is a rare thing nowadays.
A modern breastfeeding woman encounters a lot of disinformation about breast feeding questions, negative social pressure and a set of other factors undermining her decision and desire to nurse. A hundred of years ago it was no wonder that children were fed with mother’s milk till the age of 2-3 years. Our great-grandmothers remember that a lactation process is the best contraceptive. It means that the hormone prolactin is responsible for lactation and suppresses ovulation process. In the twentieth century women’s ideal changed from a wife and mother devoted to family life to a woman focused on her career. Thus, there are not as many possibilities to breastfeed a kid for a long time now as there were before. The breastfeeding absence has led to deterioration of rising generation’s health. Not only physical, but also psychological health is threatened, since children who have never tasted mother’s milk are at a much higher risk of depression, problems with behavior in awkward age and complications in adjustment to family life. Other scientific sources note the strong influence of long-term breastfeeding on person’s I.Q.: those children who were breastfed have greater achievements.
Benefits of breastfeeding
Connection of the duration of breastfeeding with successful social adaptation of a 6-8-year old child has been revealed. Babies fed by mothers for a longer period of time suffer from allergic diseases less often than those children who had breast feeding for a short time. Their immunity is stronger and in case of any disease their period of recovery is shorter than that of peers who are not getting mother’s milk. Breastfeeding children aged one year and older has significant educational impact. Close emotional communication arises during the breast sucking, which positively influences on the establishment of a close relationship with the mother. That is why children become sensitive and obedient. Social adaptation is more productive for those children who were fed with mother’s milk for a long period, than for those who were not. The child who was in a close touch with the mother during a long time is more open to this world, more confident and feels protection. It is particularly convenient to travel with such a child: there is always mother’s milk, so both meal and drink are always at the child’s disposal. There is no need to create any specific conditions for falling asleep – it is enough to put a baby to a breast. At night the baby sleeps in the same bed with its mother allowing saving money on a purchase of a separate children’s berth.
Breastfeeding is very good, but only if the young mother wants it and can produce milk, and certainly not because someone insists on it. If there is no such possibility, there still is the alternative of milk sharing and infant formula. Nowadays there are many milk banks that are developing remarkably fast. Milk banks provide untimely and ill babies with breast milk. These organizations sterilize milk and destroy the harmful bacteria. However, it is quite expensive to purchase milk from the milk banks (Rochman, 2011). Additionally, we never know what disease can donor milk bring, we cannot fully trust tests when we are not familiar with the donor which is crucial.
Theoretically, a wet-nurse is better than donor’s milk from a milk bank if women do not dwell much on her personal characteristics, unless they are entirely sure of her physical and mental health. We should not forget that donor’s milk is not natural breastfeeding, but only one of the possible forms of artificial nutrition.