In many colleges, there are some students who are awarded sponsorships to study various courses while expected to pay back to the institutions of learning through their participation in various sports (Wheeler 3). Through such arrangements, many students who are gifted have been given an opportunity to study while training and representing their institution in sporting activities done such as during the collegiate sports program. While such athletic students have been able to study, debate has emerged as to whether these group of students need to be paid for their services given that many institutions of learning are making a lot of money through sports program (Thornton, 606). Given that student athletes generate a lot of money to their institutions, it is needful for them to be paid for taking part in sports in order to retain them in college, supplement their income and reduce their exploitation by coaches or agents.
Those who believe that student athletes should not be paid base their reasoning on the fact that many student athletes are amateurs and deserve no pay (Sack 70). While this argument may be true to some extent, it is needful to realize that some well-known sportsmen once played for college. For instance, Shaquille O’Neal is prominent professional player who just played for three seasons before joining the NBA (Bernstein 14). Therefore, this argument is weak and should not be used to deny student athletes any dues.
Moreover, opponents of the debate about paying of student athletes believe that student athletes are given scholarships and have not needs that require a paycheck (Britz and Alfred 28). In fact, this group affirms that scholarships are enough to sustain student athletes throughout the academic discourse. When this statement is evaluated, it may appear as if all scholarships cater for all needs. Some scholarships do not cater for all the needs of players and this makes players strive to make ends meet. Based on this, it is important that student athletes be given some money whenever they play for their institutions.
Lastly, those who are against the payment of student athletes contend that some sports do not generate money and this would lead to unfair pay in some sports and none in some (Pedersen et al. 150). This statement may be valid to some extent through it does no suffice as a reason for not paying student athletics. If the institutions are willing to pay, it is possible to rationalize the pay in order to cater for student athletes in all sports and avoid favors.
While there are numerous reasons that opponents use to weaken the debate, these arguments are weak and some even invalid. However, paying student athletes is likely to retain then in them in institution of leaning (Mazzoni 38). Student athletes are increasingly being poached by firms who may be willing to pay them a lot of money when they signup to play for them. In order to combat the exodus of players, institutions must be willing to pay their student athletes to keep them playing for them.
Proponents of the debate on paying student athletes agree that doing so would help players supplement their income (McKenzie and Lee 265). With many students’ athletes coming from poor background, most of them have little money to take care of the needs. However, if the student athletes are paid for their services, it is possible that many of them will be able to increase access to more income. This reason underscores the need to pay student athletes for their participation in sports.
It is also believed that paying student athletes some money may allow them to avoid taking part in unethical conduct that may put the collegiate sports program into jeopardy (French 152). Given the importance of having to conduct collegiate sports program in a fair and ethical environment, it is necessary that student athletes be given the chance to earn from what sports they play so as to make them less vulnerable to unethical conduct when approached by coaches or agent in sports (DeVenzio 145).
While the debate on the payment of student athletes goes on, there seem to be conflicting arguments raised by its proponent and opponent. Those who believe that student athletes should not be paid base their argument that scholarships are expensive to give, student athletes are amateurs and that some sports do not generate money. However, these statements are weak and easily refutable. Nevertheless, it has strongly emerged that paying student athletes will increase their motivation to remain in the college rather than playing for agencies, supplement their meager income, equipping them to fight against bad conduct of some coaches or agents. Clearly, student athletes need to be paid for their services. While it is now clear that paying student athletes is critical is NCAA ready to amend it rules and regulation?